2009年2月25日 星期三

Progress on questionaire design

  • 4 research questions:
  1. Paper-based learning sheet vs. none.
  2. Electronic learning sheet vs. none.
  3. Collaboration vs. none.
  4. Trained vs. un-trained human summarizers.

4 samples learning objects also are picked up:

  1. 新網釣技倆 Pharming => manually summarized.
  2. 從一無所有走出來的 本土生菜女王
  3. 免費交換 時間貨幣正流行
  4. 電郵奇遇記 小女孩向俄總統要天竺鼠配對

Todo:

  1. Continue to summarize 2-4.
  2. Design assessment.
  3. Try Google Questionaire.
  4. What journal is good to submit?
  5. Mail to Professor Chu.
  • Research cooperation: Summarization for Chinese E-learning.

Research questions:

  1. Psychological model.
  2. Summarization model and instructional design.
  3. Integration with Mind Mapping.

2008年12月7日 星期日

IA2S rebuilding

  • Add execution-time evaluation with
    1. web version
    2. stand-alone version => try first

  • Annotation tool survey:
    1. 符合SCORM2004標準且具學習策略數位教材之編輯工具的研發.ppt (done)
    2. 應用代理人技術於符合SCORM 標準且具學習策略之學習內容編輯工具的研究與開發.pdf (reference model)
    3. Visualized Online Simple Sequencing Authoring Tool for SCORM-compliant Content Package.pdf (reference model)
  • Ask Ting-Hao's help for the IA2S (web version) execution-time evaluation
  • Microsoft Agent tool

2008年12月3日 星期三

References

  1. The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization, 2000 (NTHU)
  2. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, 1999 (NTNU, NTU, NCTU)

2008年12月1日 星期一

Paper formulation

  • Found a thesis related with the course structure. So, do a literachure review.


  • Paper 1: Automatic Learning Object Annotation for Taiwan LOM Application Profile

- References: School For All

TKU, Reload Editor

Keyword generator

MS Summarizer

- Outlines: done.

  • Paper 2: Computer Summary for On-line Chinese Learning

2008年11月23日 星期日

Paper reading: Operationalization of the Metadata Element “Difficulty”

  • Organize OCAC's vocabulary set.
  • Various formats and structures of a LO, and ambiguity and non-uniformed vocabulary in metadata elements

2008年11月21日 星期五

How to detect and construct the course structure?

  • Read Tseng's paper again.
  • Collect samples: w/ and w/o course structure
  • Verify that keywords are the obvios clues or not?

2008年11月20日 星期四

Course analysis for OCAC

  • Primary:
  1. Chinese for Preschoolers--Children's
    Songs
    , Chinese's Saying, Chinese Riddles, and Chinese
    Phrases
  2. Chinese Kindergarten
  3. Children's Chinese Reader => No contents.
  4. Learning Activites For Kids =>
    Points.
  5. Chinese glossary E-Card

=> 1, 2, 5: Short contents. No summary is needed.

  • Intermediate
  1. Speaking Mandarin in 500 Words => No contents.
  2. Speaking Mandarin in 1000 Words => Conversation.
  3. Fun with Chinese Learning => Game-based.
  • High-level
  1. Chinese For Junior High School Level => Possible.
  2. Chinese For High School Level => Possible.

------------------------------------------------------------------

  • D/L "Possible" samples after go home.
  • Get Stanford parser from CC.